Opinion: Why the hunting ban should be lifted

Should the hunting ban be lifted? Tim Bonner, Director of Campaigns at the Countryside Alliance, says yes. 

HIGHBRIDGE, ENGLAND - MAY 18:  A resident fox is seen at Secret World Wildlife Rescue in East Huntspill near Highbridge on May 18, 2015 in Somerset, England.  Prime Minister David Cameron pledged that the MPs would be given a free vote on scrapping Labour's 10 year-old controversial hunting ban if the Conservatives won the election and some Tory MPs are demanding the vote to be included in this month's Queen Speech. However the threat of the repeal of the act has raised serious concerns with a number of animal welfare charities who are opposed to hunting.  (Photo by Matt Cardy/Getty Images)

Ten years on from the hunting ban, we ask: should the ban be repealed? Tim Bonner, Director of Campaigns at the Countryside Alliance, says yes.

Advertisement

To understand what a fundamentally bad law the Hunting Act is, and why it must be repealed, it is best to start at the beginning with the original purpose of the ban.

For all the talk of animal welfare the long battle over hunting legislation was not predominantly about foxes or other mammal species it was about class, politics and a gratuitous misrepresentation of hunting and the people who do it. This is not my interpretation, but the reality as admitted by many of those who promoted the ban.

Peter Bradley, then Labour MP for The Wrekin, said shortly after the Act came into force: “now that hunting has been banned, we ought at last to own up to it: the struggle over the Bill was not just about animal welfare and personal freedom, it was class war”, the late Tony Banks, who pursued a ban on hunting from his inner London constituency for decades, proclaimed that hunting was simply “a totemic issue for the Labour Party”, whilst Tony Blair himself admitted in his biography,”I didn’t quite understand, and I reproach myself for this, that for a group of people in our society in the countryside this was a fundamental part of their way of life” and that the result was a “disaster”.

Parliament had plenty of opportunities during the 700 hours it debated the issue to opt for legislation that addressed the welfare of wild mammals, but instead opted for a law that banned one method of killing foxes whilst leaving people free to kill them in nearly any other way.

It is not illegal to shoot a fox, to trap a fox, to snare a fox or even to gas a fox, but for 10 years it has been illegal to hunt a fox, despite a complete absence of evidence that hunting is any less humane than other methods of control. Meanwhile the police are spending hundreds of hours investigating allegations of illegal hunting and thousands of pounds of your taxes are being wasted on pointless prosecutions.

Advertisement

If you think it is acceptable for Parliament to legislate against a group of people because it does not like them, then fine, leave the Hunting Act in place. If, however, this is a debate about wildlife management and animal welfare, then we need to repeal the Hunting Act and start again.

For an alternative point of view read Director of Campaigns for the League Against Cruel Sports Michael Stevenson‘s argument against lifting the hunting ban.